The aerospace and defence sector has shifted noticeably this month. It is valued notably higher than a month ago: the median EV/Sales rose to 2.0x and most companies became more expensive, the beta rose to 0.66, and the cost of capital stands at 7.5 %. Expected growth, not growth, separates the expensive companies from the cheap ones. The sector is more unsettled than in September: the choice of peers and settings moves the value more than it did.
It is the tightest of the multiples the fundamentals explain, a dispersion of 21 % across the 20 companies, and the companies are comparable in eBIT margin. EV/Sales spreads by 21 % because it carries the expected growth differences with it.
Among the stable settings it has the tightest spread across the 20 companies; R² 7 %, all 20 betas significant, less liquid group (median bid-ask spread 0.56 %). The smartZebra standard setting, 5 years monthly, has a dispersion of 55 %. The settings alone move the median beta from 0.33 to 1.31.
Ten of the twenty companies move the EV/Sales median by −15 % to +15 %, the settings by up to 93 %. Aerospace and defence sits in the settings corner of the map.
The usual yardsticks for aerospace and defence: expected growth and EBIT margin. Expected growth: confirmed (rank correlation +0.76 with EV/Sales (NTM+1)). EBIT margin: rejected (rank correlation −0.14 with EV/EBIT (NTM)). Median EV/Sales (NTM+1) by sub-group: defence 1.9x, civil aerospace & space 2.0x.
This sector in gold, the other 19 sectors in blue. Dashed lines at 40 pp are illustrative.
Banks, insurers, financial services and real estate are excluded.
Draft figures, pending approval. Valuation date 31.10.2026.
Status compares with 30.09.2026 on the same multiple and beta setting.
Low median R² (7 %).
Figures are medians of 20 companies; company-level values appear only in the change charts.
Source: smartZebra app. Start a free trial to run the numbers yourself.