The chemicals sector has shifted a bit this month. It is valued a touch higher than a month ago: the median EV/EBITDA edged up to 9.5x and most companies became slightly more expensive, the beta rose to 0.62, and the cost of capital stands at 7.2 %. Margins, not growth, separate the expensive companies from the cheap ones. The sector is calmer than in September: the choice of peers and settings moves the value less than it did.
It is the tightest of the multiples the fundamentals explain, a dispersion of 26 % across the 20 companies, and the companies are comparable in growth. EV/Sales spreads by 48 % because it carries the margin differences with it.
Among the stable settings it has the tightest spread across the 20 companies; R² 17 %, 17 of 20 betas significant, liquid group (median bid-ask spread 0.23 %). It is the smartZebra standard setting. The settings alone move the median beta from 0.38 to 0.76.
Ten of the twenty companies move the EV/EBITDA median by −13 % to +37 %, the settings by up to 47 %. Chemicals sits in the handle-with-care corner of the map.
The usual yardsticks for chemicals: EBITDA margin and ROCE. EBITDA margin: confirmed (rank correlation +0.69 with EV/EBITDA (NTM)). ROCE: rejected (rank correlation −0.17 with EV/EBIT (NTM)). Median EV/EBITDA (NTM) by sub-group: specialty, flavours & gases 12.4x, basic & commodity chemicals 8.2x, distribution 10.2x.
This sector in gold, the other 19 sectors in blue. Dashed lines at 40 pp are illustrative.
Banks, insurers, financial services and real estate are excluded.
Draft figures, pending approval. Valuation date 31.10.2026.
Status compares with 30.09.2026 on the same multiple and beta setting.
Beta setting changed from 5 years, weekly to 5 years, monthly; the beta move is measured on the new setting in both months.
Figures are medians of 20 companies; company-level values appear only in the change charts.
Source: smartZebra app. Start a free trial to run the numbers yourself.