The construction sector has shifted a bit this month. It is valued a touch lower than a month ago: the median EV/EBIT edged down to 9.8x while companies moved both ways, the beta rose to 0.97, and the cost of capital stands at 9.2 %. The sector is more unsettled than in September: the choice of peers and settings moves the value more than it did.
It is the tightest of the multiples the fundamentals explain, a dispersion of 21 % across the 20 companies, and the companies are comparable in growth and ROCE. EV/Sales spreads by 42 % because it carries the margin differences with it.
Among the stable settings it has the tightest spread across the 20 companies; R² 30 %, all 20 betas significant, less liquid group (median bid-ask spread 0.32 %). The smartZebra standard setting, 5 years monthly, has a dispersion of 24 %. The settings alone move the median beta from 0.77 to 1.04.
Ten of the twenty companies move the EV/EBIT median by −11 % to +23 %, the settings by up to 24 %. Construction sits in the relaxed corner of the map.
The usual yardsticks for construction: EBITDA margin and ROCE. EBITDA margin: rejected (rank correlation −0.04 with EV/EBITDA (NTM)). ROCE: rejected (rank correlation −0.19 with EV/EBIT (NTM)). Instead, expected growth explains more of EV/EBITDA (rank correlation +0.50). Median EV/EBITDA (NTM) by sub-group: building materials & products 10.0x, construction, engineering & concessions 5.4x.
This sector in gold, the other 19 sectors in blue. Dashed lines at 40 pp are illustrative.
Banks, insurers, financial services and real estate are excluded.
Draft figures, pending approval. Valuation date 31.10.2026.
Status compares with 30.09.2026 on the same multiple and beta setting.
Figures are medians of 20 companies; company-level values appear only in the change charts.
Source: smartZebra app. Start a free trial to run the numbers yourself.