The telecom sector has shifted noticeably this month. It is valued notably lower than a month ago: the median EV/EBIT fell to 13.0x while companies moved both ways, the beta eased to 0.21, and the cost of capital stands at 4.9 %. The sector is more unsettled than in September: the choice of peers and settings moves the value more than it did.
It is the tightest of the multiples the fundamentals explain, a dispersion of 23 % across the 20 companies, and the companies are comparable in growth and ROCE. EV/Sales spreads by 31 % because it carries the margin differences with it.
Among the stable settings it has the tightest spread across the 20 companies; R² 10 %, 18 of 20 betas significant, less liquid group (median bid-ask spread 0.39 %). The smartZebra standard setting, 5 years monthly, has a dispersion of 45 %. The settings alone move the median beta from 0.07 to 0.26.
Ten of the twenty companies move the EV/EBIT median by −10 % to +17 %, the settings by up to 44 %. Telecom sits in the settings corner of the map.
The usual yardsticks for telecom: EBITDA minus capex margin and ROCE. EBITDA minus capex margin: rejected (rank correlation +0.30 with EV/EBITDA (NTM)). ROCE: rejected (rank correlation −0.46 with EV/EBIT (NTM)). No other key figure from the statements explains EV/EBITDA clearly either – the companies are priced on things the accounts do not show.
This sector in gold, the other 19 sectors in blue. Dashed lines at 40 pp are illustrative.
Banks, insurers, financial services and real estate are excluded.
Draft figures, pending approval. Valuation date 31.10.2026.
Status compares with 30.09.2026 on the same multiple and beta setting.
Beta setting changed from 5 years, monthly to 5 years, weekly; the beta move is measured on the new setting in both months.
Figures are medians of 20 companies; company-level values appear only in the change charts.
Source: smartZebra app. Start a free trial to run the numbers yourself.